Skip to main content

Topical Issue Debate on An Post & State Contracts

17th July 2013 - Aine Collins TD

I thank the Minister of State for taking this debate. The decision by the Department of Social Protection to issue a new tender this coming September for paying social welfare benefits could, if implemented, see the closure of up to 400 post offices. This would have a devastating effect on rural communities. Bank branches in rural areas have already closed. I am concerned that this will continue not only in many villages, but also in substantial towns. It is possible that, within a few years, bank branches will only be located in cities and large provincial towns.

If post offices close in my constituency of Cork North-West, a majority of people will have no access to a financial institution in any town or village, with the possible exception of credit unions. Credit unions are being considered for rationalisation and are not open for normal hours of business in many places. The current proposals require a reduction in cash payments for social welfare benefits at post offices from the current level of 51% to 3% by 2017. This reduction in cash payments would directly result in the closure of 400 post offices.

People are sore with banks after what has happened in recent times. A new type of banking is being developed under which we must pay for each transaction. People who are in receipt of social welfare payments already have strained budgets. Many have gone through significant personal crises in recent years. Asking them to reduce their spending power in order to pay for every transaction is not something that I would support.

In many areas, the only available shop is attached to a post office. We know from a similar experience in the UK that most of these shops will close down. No cost-benefit analysis has been carried out to take into account the potential damage that could be caused by the Department’s actions socially, economically and to the overall community.

Security is also an issue. In recent times, there have been horrific crimes against older people and thugs have robbed them for small amounts of cash. In the new scenario, these same thugs will know that every pensioner will have a swipe card and a pin number, leaving them vulnerable to being forced to hand over their cards and details, guaranteeing a cash return for the robbers. Fraudulent payments could also be an issue. Making an automatic payment into a bank account with no necessity for someone to show up for payment is wide open to abuse. Unscrupulous people need not interrupt their days’ work to collect unemployment benefit fraudulently. Recipients of other payments can be living in another jurisdiction while continuing to draw their payments illegally without any fear of being detected.

During the banking crisis, the Department of Finance has benefited from significant levels of savings being deposited at post offices. If 400 post offices close, that money will gradually return to the banking system. The proposed changes may have short-term financial gains for the Department of Social Protection, but these will be more than offset by costs to other Departments, for example, the Departments of Justice and Equality, Finance and Transport, Tourism and Sport, as well as an unseen cost to the Department of Social Protection.

We must consider the potential for errors in electronic systems, such as that which occurred today. Electronic payments made to bank accounts have been delayed today due to a processing issue. Payments through post offices are a way of avoiding such a situation. This kind of delay can cause serious hardship for people who are living on the edge, where every cent counts. We all remember the impact of such a technological glitch when Ulster Bank had problems with its systems last year.

Will the Minister of State postpone this process until the impact can be fully assessed? I am not just referring to the financial impact, but to a wider community impact. I am seeking an assurance from the Minister of State that this will not be a fait accompli when we return in September. We need more in-depth consideration of these issues.

In response to the Minister’s statement:

I thank the Minister of State for his comments. While I accept the need for rationalisation and cost savings in government, particularly in the Department of Social Protection, which has the largest budget, we are discussing more than just a financial cost. Who will pay for the lodgement to the bank? Every time a transaction is carried out on an account, the individual must pay for it.

In rural Ireland, social protection means more than giving money to people in the most cost-effective way. A connection with the post office is sometimes the only outlet for social interaction that many older people have in the entire week. They look forward to their few hours on Thursday or Friday when they collect their pensions, meet their friends and do the little shopping that they require. This benefit to the entire local economy is badly needed at this time. We are all aware of the difficulties being experienced on rural high streets. Yesterday, I spent some time with traders in Charleville alongside Retail Excellence Ireland. They emphasised the importance of the mix of retail and services. The post office would be a necessary part of this mix.

We need to open a discussion on what type of society we want. Anyone who tried to shout “Stop” about the property bubble was ignored or ridiculed. We must not make the same mistake now and not shout “Stop” about changes that have the potential to rip the heart out of communities throughout the country. These changes will have a long-term impact on the type of society and communities in which we live, work and grow old.

 

I cannot overstate the importance of this issue for my constituents and people in rural Ireland generally. We are all now facing into the holidays and a new tender process will commence in September. I ask the Minister to postpone this process and allow the Government time to examine the potential impact. This action will have devastating consequences for urban and rural areas, and society in general.

I acknowledge that An Post has challenges outside the issue of social protection. We have examined the idea of paying motor tax in post offices and the Minister of State also referred to Aviva and various other payments. In small rural villages, however, such payments will not keep local post offices viable. Without social welfare payments, such post offices will not be viable. We are looking at the closure of 400 post offices and the effect that will have on jobs.